ELYT

Stress Test

Compensation Plan Analysis

Plan v1.615 Tiers
Best Case - Balanced Growth
Ideal scenario: balanced tree, high activity, low chargebacks. Tests if margins hold even when everything goes right and many affiliates qualify.
Healthy
Total Revenue$31.13M12 weeks
Total Compensation$13.45M43.2% of revenue
Company Margin$17.68MAvg 56.8%
Pool Point Value0.272Cap hit 12/12 weeks
Margin Gauge
-100%56.8%100%
LossBreak EvenProfit
Team Bonus$12.45MBinary pool
Fast Start$147.3K3 in 30 bonus
3 & Free Cost$853.5KLost subscriptions
Worst Week54.0%Lowest margin
Best Week57.0%Highest margin

Cap Overage Analysis

Amount IBOs were owed but NOT paid due to 40% binary pool cap

73.2% Clipped
Uncapped Total

$46.41M

What IBOs would earn
Actually Paid

$12.45M

After 40% cap
Total Overage

$33.96M

IBOs did NOT receive
Worst Week

$3.26M

73.9% clipped that week
26.8% paid

Impact: IBOs only receive 26.8% of their calculated team bonus. This significant reduction may cause frustration and retention issues. The overage of $33.96M represents earnings IBOs expected but did not receive.

Root Causes of Overage

mediumHigh Tier-6+ Qualifications
17.0% at Tier 6+

Too many affiliates qualifying for expensive tiers (Visionary+) relative to the pool size. High tiers pay $2,500-$250,000/week each.

Contribution: 359 affiliates drawing high payouts

mediumHigh IBO Activity Rate
85% IBOs active

When most IBOs are active, the active account counts in binary legs grow faster than expected, causing more tier qualifications.

Contribution: More active accounts = easier tier qualification

highExcessive Direct Referrals (Top Tier)
15 avg referrals

Top performers with many direct referrals create deep, active binary legs that easily meet qualification requirements.

Contribution: Rapid leg growth = easier qualification

highTier Payouts Exceed Pool Capacity
373% of pool

The sum of all tier weekly payments exceeds what the 40% pool can cover, guaranteed to hit the cap.

Contribution: Structural payout/pool mismatch

Compensation Plan Adjustments to Reduce Overage

medium priorityIncrease Tier 6+ Requirements

Make it harder to qualify for Visionary and above tiers to reduce the number of high-payout affiliates.

Plan Change

Increase activeAccounts requirements for Tiers 6-15 by 25-50%. For example, Visionary (Tier 6) from 200/200 to 300/300.

Expected Impact

Could reduce overage by 25% by limiting high-tier qualifications.

medium priorityTighten Active Definition

Require ongoing monthly volume minimums to maintain 'active' status instead of just IBO package purchase.

Plan Change

Define 'active IBO' as having $100+ PV in the last 30 days, not just lifetime IBO package purchase.

Expected Impact

Could reduce effective activity rate by 20-40%, making tier qualifications harder.

medium priorityCap Direct Referral Benefits

Limit how many direct referrals count toward leg volume requirements to prevent super-recruiters from over-qualifying.

Plan Change

Only count first 10 direct enrollees toward activeAccounts requirements per leg. Additional enrollees still generate PV but don't count for tier qualification.

Expected Impact

Prevents runaway qualification from heavy recruiters while still rewarding them with customer PV.

high priorityReduce Tier Weekly Payments

Lower the weekly payment amounts across tiers to bring total qualified payouts within pool capacity.

Plan Change

Reduce all tier weeklyPayments by 73%. Example: Tier 6 from $2,500/wk to $671/wk.

Expected Impact

Eliminates structural overage by matching payouts to pool size.

medium priorityIncrease Binary Pool Percentage

Increase the binary pool from 40% to a higher percentage to accommodate the tier payout structure.

Plan Change

Increase BINARY_POOL_PERCENT from 40% to 55%.

Expected Impact

Larger pool covers more payouts but reduces company margin.

high priorityCommunicate Pool Point Value to Affiliates

Make the PPV transparent so affiliates understand their actual earnings will be their tier payment multiplied by PPV.

Plan Change

Add PPV display in the affiliate dashboard with explanation: 'Your weekly payment = Tier Rate × Pool Point Value'.

Expected Impact

Sets proper expectations and reduces complaints when cap is hit.

Summary

This scenario has 4 identified causes contributing to the overage. Implementing the 6 suggested adjustments could significantly reduce or eliminate the gap between what affiliates expect and what the pool can pay.Focus first on high-priority suggestions for maximum impact.

Warnings & Risk Factors
Issues identified in this scenario ordered by severity
highBinary Pool Cap

Frequent Pool Cap Hits

12/12 weeks

Target: < 50% of weeks

The 40% binary pool cap was exceeded in 12 of 12 weeks (100%). IBOs routinely get reduced payouts, damaging trust and retention.

highBinary Pool Cap

Severe Pool Point Dilution

0.272

Target: > 0.80

Average PPV is 0.272, meaning IBOs only receive 27% of calculated earnings. Values below 0.80 indicate tier payouts structurally over-promise vs. the 40% pool.

highTop-Heavy Payouts

Top Tier Concentration Risk

$3,187,500/wk

Target: < 20% of revenue

124 affiliates at Royal+ tiers account for $3,187,500/week -- more than 20% of weekly revenue. This concentrates wealth at the top and may raise regulatory concerns.

mediumPayout Structure

No Individual IBO Cap Defined

The plan has no individual weekly or monthly payout cap. A single Pinnacle ELYT earns $250,000/week. Without individual caps, a small number of top earners can consume disproportionate pool share.

lowRolling Window

4-Week Rolling PV Inflates Qualifications

Orders count for 4 weeks in the rolling period. A single large order inflates PV and can cause artificial tier qualifications that disappear in week 5, creating 'tier bouncing'.

lowPlan Design

Active Status Requires Ongoing Activity

Per Plan v1.6 Section 6.2, 'Active' requires either: (1) $175 product SKU purchase every 28-day cycle, OR (2) Affiliate SKU + 3 Active personally enrolled accounts. This ties activity to ongoing subscription behavior.